Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- From: "PC" <PC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:48:01 -0500
"Mr. Jaggers" <lugburzman[at]yahoo[dot]com> wrote in message news:gqokou0mr8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Everyone would prefer a coin without the ding, most importantly the person who one day will consider buying it from either you or your heir. If you have to convince yourself that the coin is a good buy, it's not for you. A slabbed problem coin is still a problem coin.
What does that stick on the bottom of the obverse (that looks like he is about to sit on) represent?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- From: Mr. Jaggers
- Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- References:
- World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- From: Nick Knight
- Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- From: Mr. Jaggers
- World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- Prev by Date: Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- Next by Date: Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- Previous by thread: Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- Next by thread: Re: World Coins - Claim of "Finest Known" and PCGS's "Added Value"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
