Re: Mailing rolls, usps
- From: Padraic Brown <elemtilas.NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:03:02 -0500
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 19:57:44 GMT, "Brian Blackwell"
<brianblackwell@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Padraic Brown" <elemtilas.NOSPAM@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:bfv6n194h4l1pmup3nmgg83m9o19esjfd3@xxxxxxxxxx
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 14:24:40 GMT, "Brian Blackwell"
>> <brianblackwell@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"linxlvr" <donius@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>news:pan.2005.11.10.14.30.49.447793@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> What would be the cheapest way to mail two rolls lincolns, low value.
>>>> Suggestions anyone?
>>>> -- dw
>>>>
>>>
>>>The cheapest for you would be to put them in an envelope with a 1 cent
>>>stamp
>>>and no return address. The receiver will have to pay postage due that way.
>>
>> I thought that sort of thing ended up in the dead letter office?
>>
>> Padraic.
>>
>> la cieurgeourea provoer mal trasfu
>> ast meiyoer ke 'l andrext ben trasfu.
>
>Per my PO clerk, as long as there is at least one stamp, it will be
>delivered. I was mailing some stuff today so I asked.
Interesting. Wasn't aware of that.
Padraic.
la cieurgeourea provoer mal trasfu
ast meiyoer ke 'l andrext ben trasfu.
.
- References:
- Mailing rolls, usps
- From: linxlvr
- Re: Mailing rolls, usps
- From: Brian Blackwell
- Re: Mailing rolls, usps
- From: Brian Blackwell
- Mailing rolls, usps
- Prev by Date: Re: Should Krause/Mishler just ask the ANA to return the money?
- Next by Date: Re: OT Reid Trollsborough Mocking the Myopic
- Previous by thread: Re: Mailing rolls, usps
- Next by thread: Re: Who said it?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
