Re: "Who" could have had Bin Laden???

On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 16:56:43 -0500, "mmc" <eodmdc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


<gfretwell@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kta5h5dsovqi8hd5oaj58g3osmvevfqg61@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:51:13 -0500, John H <salmonbait@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:28:33 -0800 (PST), TopBassDog
<topbassdog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/topstories/2009-11-28-1014923723_x.htm

I know, I know. There are more important issues at hand. Like,
finding if there should be charges pressed onto party-crashers.

The Senators, mostly Democrat, are already getting their excuses ready
for the failure of this administration to find Osama bin Laden. Hell,
they've had almost a year. Why have they not found him yet?

Inept.


Clinton managed to dodge the criticism about why he didn't do
something about Bin Laden when Sudan offered him up to us on a silver
platter. We should have had mossad put one in his ear if we didn't
have the resolve to act. I really think we made a mistake when Carter
said we wouldn't covertly kill weasels like this.
The result in this case was over 6,000 dead in the crusades and a
couple thousand more on 9-11.


I don't think the Bush crowd could use that as any sort of excuse when they
bombed everywhere in Baghdad they could think of, trying to kill Saddam and
his sons. Even went so far as pushing funding for a tactical nuke bunker
buster since our conventionals weren't working. Not caring that the targets
for these nucular (just getting in the mood) bombs were smack in the middle
of a city of 8 million people that hadn't attacked us either. What the hell,
we dumped a *** load of our spent uranium on them in the first go-around
causing all kinds of cancers and birth defects and the kind that makes the
bright flash kills quicker so why not?
One good reason the "massive force" couldn't go after him is because the
"massive force" wasn't in the theater, they were being held for the 170,000
troop push into Baghdad. By December 2001 we had something like 3,000 troops
in Afghanistan.
Was the FAILURE to go after these people like someone who cared about 9/11
collusion or incompetence?
Oh, I forgot, it must have been Obamas fault. Maybe Reid or Pelosi. Couldn't
have been Bush, Cheney and the rest of that band, they're up for sainthood.
My bad.


Bush has nothing to do with the ineptness of the current
administration.

Where is Osama? We know where Obama is.
--

John H
.

Quantcast