Re: Thoughts on 1969

On Jul 20, 3:59 pm, "Calif Bill" <nospambmc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Frogwatch" <ohara...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:af462c99-d3a3-4cb4-ba87-e68df357c204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jul 20, 1:22 pm, thunder <thunderTAKE...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 09:52:19 -0700, Frogwatch wrote:
NASA wants to de-orbit the space station believe it or not in 2016.

Yup, $100 billion spent, a now that it's nearing completion? If NASA
wants to de-orbit the ISS, perhaps, it's time to de-orbit NASA.
Personally, I think they are just fishing for more $$, and more
projects.

I cannot even blame NASA, they did what seemed right, ending the
Saturn V top develop a "re-usable" cheap system except it is neither
reusable nor cheap.  Thye all made a simple mistake with ending the
Saturn V.

Standing next to a Saturn V is a humbling experience.  Frigging huge.
Amazing they worked as well as they did.  How many million parts?  NASA was
building a smaller, cheaper shuttle, and to get more money, accepted
military money to build a big delivery truck.  They should have build 2
sizes.  One for the big parts and a smaller one for research and delivery of
smaller stuff to orbit.  Most of the satellites could have been deliver to
low orbit via a small shuttle.  And a smaller shuttle could have been built
without the huge aux tanks and most likely fly from an airfield, not a
launch pad.

The shuttle is far from re-usable requiring a near complete rebuild of
its propulsion system every time. The analogy of throwing away your
car every time you use it that was used to justify trying to develop a
re-usable system is a false one because your car's mass is not 90%
fuel just to get to the grocery store whereas being 90% fuel (roughly)
is an actual physics requirement of rockets needing to get to 17,000
mph. It truly is cheaper to throw the rocket away than to try to re-
use it.
Rather than try to develop a re-usable system, they should have
concentrated on making the Saturn V cheaper. Add Solid Rocket
boosters for more payload capability. Development of low mass
composite fuel tanks would have considerably increased payload. Ramp
up to a 4 person command module. Develop a re-usable LEM because you
do not want to lift that thing into space and then to the moon every
time you want to use it.
A shuttle is a bizarre thing to lift into orbit, those wings have mass
and that reduces payload capability, forget it, it was a bad idea.
The Saturn came in three diff sizes already.
If only....If only we had not made the mistake of trying to build the
shuttle, we would have a robust reliable evolved Saturn based launch
system.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Thoughts on 1969
    ... wants to de-orbit the ISS, perhaps, it's time to de-orbit NASA. ... Saturn V top develop a "re-usable" cheap system except it is neither ... low orbit via a small shuttle. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Global wireless hotspot
    ... the decision to completely cancel Saturn and go for the Shuttle are ... system using nuclear pulse rockets fueled by cold war weapons. ... You're only counting a fraction of the cost. ... fleet would put up 6,240 metric tons while the Shuttle Fleet puts up ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Scrapping of Saturn-V
    ... Shuttle ", 3rd edition. ... Saturn could lift the station and the Shuttle could supply it. ... to LEO in one launch capability, ... carefully store the rockets already paid for. ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Buran evolution - wish I understood Russian!
    ... Saturn V. Saturn IB had quite a few flights under its belt before it ... mind for the first Apollo test flight- you were going to launch the first ... shuttle test flights were still test pilots willing to take risks. ... I don't think NASA thought they could afford a long, ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Space Shuttle Grounding....depressing....
    ... >>>As has been often pointed out, the Shuttle has always been, and still ... >> were to have been lifted to the space station with Saturn V's produced ... engine in its first stage, ... but all such designs floundered on the fact that NASA was ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)