Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: JohnH <salmonbait@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:09:24 -0500
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:56:55 -0500, Boater <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:15:45 -0500, Boater <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:25:37 -0500, Boater <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JohnH wrote:You want to spend money on intel assets. Intel assets don't 'prevent' war.
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:08:11 -0500, Boater <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:RFC
JohnH wrote:So we should stop building ships?
On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:20:20 -0500, Boater <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Both.
Richard Casady wrote:In what way are they wasting money on warships, Harry? Should we not be
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 11:28:46 -0800, "Calif Bill"Gee, I just bought a carbon fiber tripod. Maybe they could make warships
<bmckeespam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The problem with lots of the aluminum ship structures was bad design. LotsActually, since aluminum and steel have the same strength to weight
of cracks happening. So better designers were needed. Harry maybe?
ratio, it would seem that someone heard rumors that aluminum is
lighter, and designed it that way. Lighter is weaker. Duh.
Casady
out of that. It wouldn't be any more a waste of taxpayer money than what
they are doing now.
building them, or should we be building them with a different design?
--
John H
I think spending $500 million on another high tech toy for the military
is a waste of taxpayer dollars. Better that money be spent on brainy
people assets that can be used for intel and other purposes that prevent
war. The problem with that sort of "flashy" ship is that some yahoo in
the chain of command will want to use to to make a point. The point
won't be made, and its presence will contribute to us getting into
another stupid shooting war.
--
John H
They may give a heads up, like they did with the WMD Saddam was developing.
Should we stop building ships?
--
John H
Intel assets don't prevent war? That's a really interesting statement,
considering this country's recent history in invading Iraq.
Read my post. The intel assets we, and many other countries, had did not
prevent us from attacking Iraq. They gave us the heads up on the WMD being
developed by Saddam.
To answer your question, since you don't seem to be able to read and
understand my lengthy response, I don't believe we should be wasting a
half billion dollars of taxpayer money on a high tech toy for the Navy.
Once again, try reading for content.
It's hard not to make personal insults, isn't it?
Do you believe we should not build new ships? You've never answered that
question. If it is the cost that bothers you, how much do you think we
should spend for a new ship?
--
John H
I'm sorry, John, but I really don't see any purpose in playing word
games with you. If you can't figure it out, it is your problem, not
mine, because, to be blunt (and not offensive), I don't give a shit what
you think...
About anything.
Merry Christmas.
Harry, I find you like most liberals. You make pronouncements on subjects
about which you know nothing. When someone questions you with specifics,
you quickly demur, change the subject, or begin with the personal insults.
Maybe some of you are different. I'd sure like to meet one.
About whose thoughts do you care, Harry? Maybe that person could be enticed
into asking you a question to which you could give a straightforward reply.
If your answer is 'no one in this group', then why do you continue to post
here?
Apparently a deal to stop with the personal insults is out of the question?
I notice you've started again. Is that your 'taking responsibility for your
actions'?
--
John H
*Have a Super Christmas and a Spectacular New Year!*
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- References:
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Calif Bill
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Richard Casady
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: JohnH
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: JohnH
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: JohnH
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: JohnH
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- From: Boater
- Re: Interesting visitor....
- Prev by Date: Re: Digging around in the sock drawer
- Next by Date: We should really invite...
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting visitor....
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting visitor....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|