Re: Wonder why................

On Apr 30, 7:12 am, "JimH" <as...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"HK" <payer33...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:EaadnVPVCeHa0IXVnZ2dnUVZ_s_inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx





John H. wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:28:14 -0700 (PDT), Chuck Gould
<chuckgould.ch...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Chuck, the references to the 'trash', 'snarks', and other name-calling
about the people who post in this group, does not provide an atmosphere
which is enjoyable.

You are easily able to see which comments are directed towards a few
posters over here. A little moderation wouldn't hurt.

You could, of course, say that the name-calling is non-specific. But,
we
both know better, especially when the same individual comes over here
and
starts citing individuals.

Other than that, I think the idea is great.

--
John *H*- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
There has been very little of that, and it hasn't recurred- at least
that I have noticed- for at least a little while now.

Hey, nothing is perfect; but there are certain groups that have more
insults thrown in 10 minutes than we've seen in 45 days.

I just checked back to see if a certain party had any further comment
expounding on his charge that people are being moderated according to
their political beliefs, and moderated by a guy who "plays dirty". As
you have observed, so far nobody has been moderated at all. We
disagree whether there were one or two posts that could or should have
been. That's expected; two reasonable adults will hold different
opinions sometimes- but we can hold diverse opinions without reverting
to grammar school behavior... and as you notice- you and I are doing
just that.

As there are apparently no additonal comments on this matter from the
party to whom I was alerted this morning, I'll bid rec.boats adieu for
now. :-)

Glad to hear the name-calling has stopped. I agree that adults can hold
differing opinions. But the name-calling isn't necessary.

Nor are your lies about it.

Herring and company keep proving what I said in my original post to this
thread.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry and JimH calling other people liars!!!!!!!!
That's the BEST example of the pot calling the kettle black that I've
ever seen!!!!!
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated
    ... NG may never reach "critical mass" ). ... Discussion of moderation policy should be permitted. ... with the "wrong" opinions. ... "club" on usenet, and that's why we're getting these lies. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Moderated group voting procedure
    ... Even if that new newsgroup is blatantly going to be run by a clique ... because you have the "wrong" opinions. ... If the whole exercise had truly been about impartial moderation, ... , to ensure that censorship in the new ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Wonder why................
    ... A little moderation wouldn't hurt. ... You could, of course, say that the name-calling is non-specific. ... two reasonable adults will hold different ... opinions sometimes- but we can hold diverse opinions without reverting ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Pre-RFD: uk.rec.cycling.moderated
    ...  Don't spend too much time navel-gazing - I ... Just get rid of the two root causes, ... once there's a big troll-stick the problem of moderation will become minimal ... certain opinions who you can't find any other reason to ban. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: Wonder why................
    ... A little moderation wouldn't hurt. ... starts citing individuals. ... I just checked back to see if a certain party had any further comment ... opinions sometimes- but we can hold diverse opinions without reverting ...
    (rec.boats)