Re: NASA Sees Arctic Ocean Circulation Do an About-Face

On Nov 14, 6:02 pm, "BillP" <Bi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<LoogyPic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:1195073704.211666.301470@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





On Nov 14, 11:52 am, "BillP" <Bi...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Gene Kearns" <gene.boat...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:uu7mj3p2pjibrmunu7rtq5jq4actrns1ph@xxxxxxxxxx

On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:25:58 GMT, BillP penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

|http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/ipy-20071113.html
|
|
|
|"Our study confirms many changes seen in upper Arctic Ocean
circulation
in
|the 1990s were mostly decadal in nature, rather than trends caused by
global
|warming"
|

And this *proves* what?

It proves at least one part of human induced GW theory is incorrect.-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

What part is that?

The part that says man made CO2 is causing the ice caps to melt.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you'd be well advised to learn to comprehend what you've read.
Where is it in that article that says that without a doubt man made
CO2 isn't causing the ice caps to melt? What proof do they provide to
back that claim?
.

Relevant Pages