Re: That's it.
- From: jps <trash@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 13:56:07 -0800
In article <qqLFf.6907$Nv2.4391@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
bmckeespam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
"Shortwave Sportfishing" <onetwothree@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3ffeu1lvgb6lb518qtjfrr7nqt7lmbq4ob@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:10:21 -0800, jps <trash@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <kkadu15vm0lufr3d24afdqo16b94k8bv71@xxxxxxx>,
onetwothree@xxxxxxxx says...
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:32:53 -0500, "RCE" <rce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Congrats, Tom.
it ain't over until its over.
although the good father had a couple of choice words on the
telephone.
hell have to see his confessor tomorrow. :>)
and hes gonna owe me dinner. :>)
Refs and the league got the outcome they wanted. Two insane calls to
take touchdowns away from Seattle.
The first in the end zone was a ticky tacky call, after the defensive
man had committed interference that wasn't called. The second play for
the reception on the 1 yard line by Jeremy Stevens called back on a
hold, for which there was no evidence on the replay.
I won't even dispute the called touchdown for the Steelers 'cause it
looked like the ball could have crossed the plane before quarterback was
tackled. The ref who made the call first indicated the ball was down
short and then changed his mind. Pretty dicey.
Tainted win for Steelers. Seattle gets purposely shafted by the refs.
Evidently there's just not enough money in a Seattle win.
come on - take it like a man you loser. :>)
Wattayouexpect. Northwet pansy.
Fuck you, Bill.
Read the truth, if you can handle it:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs05/columns/story?
columnist=smith_michael&id=2320683
.
- References:
- That's it.
- From: RCE
- Re: That's it.
- From: jps
- Re: That's it.
- From: Calif Bill
- That's it.
- Prev by Date: Re: A file remover that really, truly works...
- Next by Date: ESPN calls a spade a spade
- Previous by thread: Re: That's it.
- Next by thread: Re: That's it.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
