Re: More on the NY Times


"JohnH" <jherring1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2tgdq1ddp3cgimrjl57scas3cmqvqsvb5q@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 14:20:42 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
> <ancientangler@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"JohnH" <jherring1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:lr9bq1pquj19m92beml1v1mkq75n45f0o6@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>>>Therefore, you do not actually read the NYT. Or, you have some serious
>>>>reading comprehension issues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You've gotta make a personal attack, don't you?
>>>
>>> I get the NYTimes daily. I read what I want to read of it daily.
>>> Comments
>>> I've made about the NYT
>>> were based on my reading of the NYT.
>>>
>>> Now, I can see where this is heading, so I'll stop with you for now.
>>> --
>>> John H
>>
>>John, perhaps you are bothered by the fact that some newspapers don't
>>paint
>>a perfectly rosy picture. But, that wouldn't be fair and balanced, would
>>it?
>>Maybe you want to see the good news, undiluted, in one article, and the
>>bad
>>news in another, also undiluted? Most newspapers tend to blend the good
>>and
>>the bad together, though.
>>
>
> No, I'm bothered by the fact that some folks can't seem to discuss a topic
> without going in to a
> 'smart-ass' personal attack mode.
>
> So, have a good day.
> --
> John H

Well, when you begin playing your tired game, I get a little edgy. I've seen
precisely the types of articles which you claim do not exist in the NYT. Am
I hallucinating? Or, are we reading different versions of the same
newspaper?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More on the NY Times
    ... you do not actually read the NYT. ... >> were based on my reading of the NYT. ... >John, perhaps you are bothered by the fact that some newspapers don't paint ... 'smart-ass' personal attack mode. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Is "I love you" appropriate in therapy?
    ... >In the absence of any clarification, I have to go with my first impression ... This does not include, BTW, adjunctive telephone counseling associated ... you saw my comment as a 'personal attack' when the plain text is ... >in response to John, those posts are rejected by the moderators, ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated)
  • Re: Hamiltons Rule is Xenos Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating
    ... > and accusing John of being an idiot. ... "personal attack" yet it is incorrectly taken to be so by many here. ... > theoretical mathematician to comment more, and in any case I don't think ... The paradox was never _empirically_ based. ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Hamiltons Rule is Xenos Paradox ( was Re: Underestimating
    ... >> and accusing John of being an idiot. ... > "personal attack" yet it is incorrectly taken to be so by many here. ... > do not consider calling Prof. Felsenstein "The Pope of Neo Darwinism to be ... > Independent Researcher ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Is "I love you" appropriate in therapy?
    ... > I tend to agree with John that this example was not a personal attack. ... here bimonthly or the charter on the Web at http://psychcentral.com/sppm/ ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.psychology.psychotherapy.moderated)