Re: OT--It's Scalito!

In article <50kcm1tlglaslqtb3urophacfn0tj50a5c@xxxxxxx>,
onetwothree@xxxxxxxx says...
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:00:07 -0500, Harry Krause
> <harry.krause@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
> >> On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:49:30 GMT, "NOYB" <noyb@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> <chuckgould.chuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >>> news:1130776211.867509.181560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> Unless Bush is a dumb as he appears
> >>>> (could be) this is likely the move he had in mind from the beginning.
> >>> You mean, they misunderestimated him again? ;-)
> >>
> >> Know what I find interesting about all this?
> >>
> >> If this had been a, say, liberal appellate judge of the same name,
> >> would you think that CNN, et. al., would combine Scalia and Alito?
> >>
> >> Isn't that sort of ethnically insensitive on the part of the media?
> >>
> >> What's next - that he's the Mafia's personal appellate judge?
> >
> >
> >CNN just picked up on the nickname the conservatrashers call him.
>
> Bull***. I saw Soledad O'Brien use it prior to any conservative
> commentary.

It's been in use for quite some time. Perhaps you should start an
investigation on when who knew what.

I'm guessing Libby and Rove are involved.

jps
.

Quantcast