Re: Surround Sound?
- From: " *JimH*" <me1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 16:03:08 -0400
"Harry Krause" <harry.krause@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3s1v7bFlvv3kU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> My oldest stereo amp died. I used it to control the sound from a TV set
> and CD player in our family room. I have a terrific Yamaha receiver I'm
> using in my office and I plan to relocate that unit to the family room.
>
> That means I am in the market for a new stereo receiver or amp for my
> office. I am driving two electrostatic speakers and a powered subwoofer.
>
> I am NOT a fan of surround sound. I don't like to sit in the middle of the
> sound generated by orchestras, bands, or opera performances, or movies. I
> also don't feel like running additional wires to additional speakers for
> surround sound.
>
> But the world seems to have passed me by on surround sound. I am having
> one hell of a time finding a good receiver or amp that puts out 100-150
> watts a channel for a pair of speakers and a subwoofer, and doesn't have
> the extra five channels of output for the surround sound I don't want.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> I've looked at Yamaha, Denon, and a couple of other brands. A Denon
> DRA-685 is close, but no cigar.
>
> If God thought surround sound was good, he would have given us ears on the
> back of our heads.
>
Some good folks here who can help you:
http://www.crutchfield.com/S-Gp9Qa4txTko/
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Surround Sound?
- Next by Date: Re: Surround Sound?
- Previous by thread: Re: Surround Sound?
- Next by thread: Re: Surround Sound?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
