Re: OT--Very good news for the security of the US!


"OlBlueEyes" <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns96CEC1DB94FBBOlBlueEyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Thomas Ranger" <ihatenewsbots@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:ko6dnR299P_ZwLneRVn-hg@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>>
>> "OlBlueEyes" <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:Xns96CE5D944590FOlBlueEyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> John Sobieski <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in
>>> news:200509110939.j8B9dSur011775@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>> On 10 Sep 2005, "Sam" <woodcraftssuch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>NOYB wrote:
>>>>>> This ruling did nothing to infringe on the rights of US citizens
>>>>>> who don't take up arms against this country.
>>>>>
>>>>>The requirements of the charge of "taking up arms" are vague and
>>>>>subjective, subject to the whims of the political party in power,
>>>>>who at present are Republicans, which party at present seems to have
>>>>>in office an overabundance of paranoid, narrow minded, greedy liars
>>>>>and a base of comparatively stupid people whipped into a fundamental
>>>>>religious and patriotic froth. Real US citizens have plenty to fear
>>>>>with people like you and them in power. Sam
>>>>
>>>> Messing around and planning to make a dirty bomb is not on the
>>>> forefront of a Real US citizen's mind.
>>>
>>> Neither was it in the forefront of Jose Padilla's mind. Why don't
>>> you try actually PAYING ATTENTION to the case? The Feds abandoned
>>> the "dirty bomb" allegation quite a while ago.
>>
>> Why do you insist on defending an obvious scumbag?
>
> What led you to conclude that citizen Padilla is "an obvious scumbag"?
> The now-abandoned "dirty bomb" allegation? Or something else claimed by
> the same liars who originated the "dirty bomb" allegation?


Why didn't you answer my simple question? You snipped it out. I'll repeat
it.

Where is Kennedy, Pelosi, Boxer, Hillary, etc. in all of this. Why aren't
they shouting out to the American Public the injustice?. They have the
podium for it. Maybe they agree. Do they perceive protecting a real danger
to our country is not worth their political careers?

What is your opinion on why they remain silent in this matter?


Please answer the question. Maybe they know a hell of a lot more than you?

Your opinion is all I asked, not a snipped commentary on my thoughts. Trying
to be coy, clever, and evasive? It won't work.

Your opinion please!

Thomas






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT--Very good news for the security of the US!
    ... >>> Neither was it in the forefront of Jose Padilla's mind. ... >>> you try actually PAYING ATTENTION to the case? ... > What led you to conclude that citizen Padilla is "an obvious scumbag"? ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
    ... Call it opinion, if you like, but we're not all one group mind. ... One says that the car that crashed was in the ... "god exists" is an objective statement. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
    ... Call it opinion, if you like, but we're not all one group mind. ... One says that the car that crashed was in the ... If I say "I believe God exists" ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: no prophet?
    ... But even if you don't affect a "change" of mind, ... sources and the validity of the arguments on the opinion pages.) ... Ben Gurion once asked the Hazon Ish (Rabbi Avraham Yshaayahu ... likened the religious tradition to a full wagon and secular Israeli ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Methodological Materialism and Philosophical Materialism
    ... Call it opinion, if you like, but we're not all one group mind. ... Two eyewitnesses see a car crash ... "god exists" is an objective statement. ...
    (talk.origins)
Loading