Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Bruce in Bangkok <b*paige*125@g*mail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 08:09:14 +0700
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:21:53 GMT, Jere Lull <jerelull@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2008-04-12 11:56:41 -0400, richardcasady@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard
Casady) said:
over the years. Btw, he could just leave the battery in the boat with
a $10 solar panel during the week.
You underestimate the size and cost of a useful size solar panel by a
large factor.
I was going to disagree with your post, but luckily re-read it.
IF electric could serve his purposes, a little 12w panel would normally
recharge 100 or so amps between weekends. That happens to be our setup
and it's worked like a charm for a few years. (Our 12w panel cost a bit
more than $10, though.)
Something I haven't pursued, though, is that I recall someone saying
that VWs are shipped with small solar cells to keep their batteries up,
and that those cells can be gotten for very cheap. A few of those might
be sufficient, and may cost in the $10 range.
Then, along comes the three day weekend and the guy wants to use the
boat three days in a row......
Or to put it another way, I know a lot of people who's only source of
power is an internal combustion engine but I don't know anyone who's
only source of power is a solar panel.
Bruce-in-Bangkok
(correct email address for reply)
.
- References:
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Jere Lull
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Jay
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Jay
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Bruce in Bangkok
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Wayne . B
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: PhantMan
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Bruce in Bangkok
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: PhantMan
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Richard Casady
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- From: Jere Lull
- Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- Prev by Date: Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- Next by Date: Re: Working on my dipstick
- Previous by thread: Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- Next by thread: Re: Suzuki DF4 vs. DF6
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|