Re: Freak waves
- From: Wayne.B <waynebatrecdotboats@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:13:15 -0500
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:46:33 GMT, "Roger Long" <rwlong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>I've run across this picture a couple places on the net and am
>wondering if it is real or a digital paste up.
>
>http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2004/07/25/wave_wideweb__430x275.jpg
>
>If real, it is very spooky because of the relatively benign conditions
>around it. You would expect something like this in a well developed
>major storm but not in the general sea state shown.
>
>It doesn't look like a breaking shoal. If these things do exist, they
>must be exceedingly rare and this must be one of the luckiest pictures
>ever taken.
>
>I'm guessing this is a digital fake.
If so, here's another one from today's NY Times:
http://travel.nytimes.com/pages/travel/index.html
The surrounding water looks even flatter.
Here's some more:
http://tinyurl.com/av3gv
http://tinyurl.com/8mb4e
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Freak waves
- From: Roger Long
- Re: Freak waves
- References:
- Freak waves
- From: Roger Long
- Freak waves
- Prev by Date: Re: Man dies in capsizing
- Next by Date: Re: sailmail and airmail via JVCOMM32 (was) Re: WeatherFax
- Previous by thread: Freak waves
- Next by thread: Re: Freak waves
- Index(es):