Re: Antennas, again, sorta (WiFi connectivity afloat)



On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:00:05 GMT, Damian James <djames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:36:06 -0400, Skip Gundlach said:
>> ...
>> To recap the original, the AP and Bridge were Senao 200mw 2611 deluxe units,
>> connected via cat5, both 12V. Not elucidated, I don't think(recall), was
>> the AP had a (5+dBi) rubber duck to see me (and any others who looked with
>> their wifi setup) and the bridge had an 8.5dBi stick to see and talk to
>> places far away. Never got to talk to each other on the bench, let alone up
>> the mast. Always a conflict whenever I connected the two together,
>> regardless of the IP configuration(s) used.
>
>Just a thought: you've got the orientation right with the cat5?
>Connecting two hubs/switches together requires that either
> 1) one or both network devices has the capability to
> auto-detect the orientation of the cable; or
> 2) you use a crossover cable.
>
>This is also required connecting two computers without a hub/switch.
>Crossover cables will have pins 1 and 2 switched with pins 3 and 6.
>That would be:
>
> w/g g w/o bl w/bl o w/br br
>
>on one end, and:
>
> w/o o w/g bl w/bl g w/br br
>
>at the other end.
>
>I'm reluctant to mention it because probably you've got this part
>sorted out. But it's certainly a show-stopper if you haven't.
>
>If this is ot hte issue, then what exactly do you mean by "conflict"?
>You mentioned messages of some kind?
>
>--Damian

Interesting thread. What are you actually trying to achieve?
what is your end goal? You have 802.11b/g to deal with. If you have
either of these, you need a match on shore. What do you have on shore
and what do you have on your PC?

If you are talking about CAT5, you don't have wireless.



Gary Gaugler, Ph.D.
Microtechnics, Inc.
Granite Bay, CA 95746
916.791.8191
gary@microtechnics dot com
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: sensitivity of 100MBit switches, single/double shildet cable
    ... I may be wrong but I believe CAT5 should never be shielded. ... metallic film around the wires to help ... If it's connected at both ends, you're connecting the ... As in "ground loops"? ...
    (comp.os.linux.networking)
  • Re: Trying to network Win98 and WinXP
    ... "mikeH" wrote in message ... > In connecting the two together via Cat5 I ran the network wizard in XP. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Performance issue with new pipe profile feature in FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE
    ... I have a simple setup with two computer connected via a FreeBSD bridge ... But as I was experimenting with the pipe profile feature I ran into some issues. ... Client connecting to 10.0.0.254, TCP port 5001 ...
    (freebsd-net)
  • Re: XP Network Bridge Problem
    ... got multiple machines connecting to this WAP successfully (two laptops, ... The WAP has a WEP key and MAC filtering. ... adapter that works just fine AS LONG AS I DON'T ... BRIDGE IT WITH THE ETHERNET ADAPTER. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: Pairing 2 sets of bridges on one LAN for increased bandwidth
    ... D-Link 2200 APs operating in bridge mode. ... You should be getting 25Mbits/sec thruput with your wireless. ... You'll need some manner of load balancer or just live with seperate ... It all depends on line of sight and what you are connecting. ...
    (alt.internet.wireless)