Re: Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies



On Aug 1, 9:27 pm, pdxrandonneur <pdxrandonn...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jul 31, 5:39 pm, Andre Jute <fiult...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Kiss my arse, sonny

 Jesus! How nasty do I have to be to get killfiled? Well here goes...

(*Flame on*)

 Look andrea, you *clearly* have an advanced case of Usenet
Persecution Disorder. I understand that you were violently molested in
the bathroom in gradeschool, or almost stangled to death by your
mother during a fit of her (perfectly understandable) postpartum
depression, or whatever, and that you can no more control your idiotic
behaviour than a crackhead can stop selling his ass on the street for
the next hit, but this is 2009 and psychiatry has made many real
advances. I know that the last time you went in they tied you to a
gurney and ran electrical current through your head, let the orderlies
beat and sodomize you while you were doped up on thorazine, and then
left you in that nasty room for weeks on end with that guy who ate his
whole family, but those were the bad old days and we don't do those
kind of things to mental patients anymore (at least not when we have
some muslims prisoners to brutalize instead). Today they will simply
give you a nice prescription for some happy pills and a comfortable
chair with a compassionate and understanding professional who will
help you sort out all those painful issues you are hiding from here on
the usenet. And I KNOW that all your supporters here in RBT will be
VERY VERY happy to kick in with some money if you can't afford the
doctor's bills. Truly.

 Because from here on out the delusions of grandeur and persecution
are going to give way to a full blown paranoid psychosis, and as much
as I would just *love* to read about how you slit your own throat
after painting yourself pink and wrapping your head in tin foil to
stop the mind control rays from the CIA, this is a treatable condition
and no one, no matter how fucking annoying, no matter how really
amazingly arrogantly annoying, no matter how narcissisticly in love
with his own retarded usenet drivel, no matter how seduced by his own
stupid voice, no matter how drunk on his own bull***, no matter how
driven by unresolved childhood anxiety to smear his verbal diarrea all
over a public forum, deserves that kind of a death. Really. Except
maybe you. But in the name of decency and mercy and all that, get help
before it is too late. And please for the love of the God and The
Devil and whoever, cancel your fucking internet service.

-Rando

Now Rando -- you don't mind if I call you Rando, do you? -- just lie
back on the comfortable couch -- ye-es, that's it! -- and inhale
deeply, let your stomach go, relax, more deep breath, ye-esssss, good.
Now, in your own time tell me if you really believe all that, or
perhaps can't let on, because the other roadies will ostracize you for
breaking ranks and "betraying" their religion, that instead you
believe this:

It is one of the ironies that amuses those of use who watch the farce
of Global Warming that the Global Warmies are always accusing their
critics of mistaking a little local weather for global climate --
exactly the sin the Global Warmies themselves commit daily, failing
over themselves to be the first on television to pontificate that some
squall in the bay is a result of Global Warming.

In the 1990s the Global Warmies mistook a little natural rise in
temperature on the upswing from the Little Ice Age a few hundred years
ago for -- the doors to Hell, glowing red with heat. The world would
frizzle and burn within three hundred years! The oceans would boil
away!

These selfsame Global Warmies failed to foresee that the world was
already swinging into a cooler period even as they screeched their
dire warnings. They're still going on about Global Warming, even
though temperatures have not recovered to the level of 1998, a
pleasantly mild year, I seem to remember.

Now we have one Phil H, who describes himself as a "Global warming
skeptic and Jute critic". Perhaps he doesn't like me putting down some
idiots who still suffer under the myth that the North Panel of the NAS
supported Michael Mann's Hockey Stick, which is the main tool in the
hands of the IPCC for inducing climactic (heh-heh) terror in world
leaders. Anyhow, Phil H, a wannabe skeptic and critic, tells us:

Fluctuations in short term weather are unpredictable
but longer term trends in climate change are "less" so.

It all depends on how long Phil H is prepared to accept as "longer
term", but my first observation is that this "global warming critic"
has been taken in by the hubris of the Global Warming industry, which
pretends they can predict climate decades and centuries ahead.

It's all crap. The most powerful force working on the climate of our
little planet is the sun, and its most powerful mechanism which
affects world climate -- temperature, among other facets -- is sunspot
activity.

Sunspot activity has peaks and troughs on an approximately eleven-year
cycle.

Anyone who claims to predict the weather beyond ten years is claiming
to be God, because around the eleventh year he'll have to control the
Sun itself if his prediction is not to be turned into another Global
Warmie lie by sunspots.

So far they can't even predict the weather for those ten years before
the sunspots do something uncontrollable.

Those clowns can't even predict the weather for next year.

All the climatologists who pretend to know so much that they should,
without cost-benefit analysis, be the driving force behind spending
trillions of our money on controlling the climate generations hence --
could not even forecast that the last uprise in global temperature
would soon be followed by a cooling period, a feat that is easily
managed by any less arrogant scientist or even by historicans.

Natural fluctuations, Rando, natural fluctuations. It's the iron
law of nature.

Don't believe everything you hear, Rando. Especially about the
weather.

Andre Jute
Visit Andre's books at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/THE%20WRITER'S%20HOUSE.html

.