Re: Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- From: Andre Jute <fiultra1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 31, 6:21 am, Lickle <meysp...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Andre Jute wrote:
It is one of the ironies that amuses those of use who watch the farceSend some tech, Lickle. And keep the faith. -- AJ
of Global Warming that the Global Warmies are always accusing their
critics of mistaking a little local weather for global climate --
exactly the sin the Global Warmies themselves commit daily, failing
over themselves to be the first on television to pontificate that some
squall in the bay is a result of Global Warming.
In the 1990s the Global Warmies mistook a little natural rise in
temperature on the upswing from the Little Ice Age a few hundred years
ago for -- the doors to Hell, glowing red with heat. The world would
frizzle and burn within three hundred years! The oceans would boil
away!
These selfsame Global Warmies failed to foresee that the world was
already swinging into a cooler period even as they screeched their
dire warnings. They're still going on about Global Warming, even
though temperatures have not recovered to the level of 1998, a
pleasantly mild year, I seem to remember.
Now we have one Phil H, who describes himself as a "Global warming
skeptic and Jute critic". Perhaps he doesn't like me putting down some
idiots who still suffer under the myth that the North Panel of the NAS
supported Michael Mann's Hockey Stick, which is the main tool in the
hands of the IPCC for inducing climactic (heh-heh) terror in world
leaders. Anyhow, Phil H, a wannabe skeptic and critic, tells us:
Fluctuations in short term weather are unpredictable
but longer term trends in climate change are "less" so.
It all depends on how long Phil H is prepared to accept as "longer
term", but my first observation is that this "global warming critic"
has been taken in by the hubris of the Global Warming industry, which
pretends they can predict climate decades and centuries ahead.
It's all crap. The most powerful force working on the climate of our
little planet is the sun, and its most powerful mechanism which
affects world climate -- temperature, among other facets -- is sunspot
activity.
Sunspot activity has peaks and troughs on an approximately eleven-year
cycle.
Anyone who claims to predict the weather beyond ten years is claiming
to be God, because around the eleventh year he'll have to control the
Sun itself if his prediction is not to be turned into another Global
Warmie lie by sunspots.
So far they can't even predict the weather for those ten years before
the sunspots do something uncontrollable.
Those clowns can't even predict the weather for next year.
All the climatologists who pretend to know so much that they should,
without cost-benefit analysis, be the driving force behind spending
trillions of our money on controlling the climate generations hence --
could not even forecast that the last uprise in global temperature
would soon be followed by a cooling period, a feat that is easily
managed by any less arrogant scientist or even by historicans.
Natural fluctuations, Virginia, natural fluctuations. It's the iron
law of nature.
Don't believe everything you hear, Phil H. Especially about the
weather.
Andre Jute
Visit Andre's books at
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/fiultra/THE%20WRITER'S%20HOUSE.html
rec...bicycles....tech?
.
- References:
- Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- From: Andre Jute
- Re: Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- From: Lickle
- Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- Prev by Date: Re: restoring an old leather saddle - any opinions or experience?
- Next by Date: Re: he fired a handgun at a bicyclist
- Previous by thread: Re: Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- Next by thread: Re: Hubris runs riot in Global Warmies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
