Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: jwbinpdx <jbeattie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 19:22:28 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 2, 5:33 pm, SMS <scharf.ste...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nick L Plate wrote:
On 1 Mar, 19:06, jim beam <retard-t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
eh? what are those "obvious reasons"?
goading you.
TJ
LOL, no that's not one of the reasons, but I suppose that it's a side
benefit!
The cro-mo forks are more shock absorbent and less susceptible to
catastrophic failure due to fatigue. Even Cannondale uses a chromoly
fork on their aluminum touring bicycle, as does Koga-Miyata and REI
(Safari). Perhaps there is a touring bicycle somewhere that uses an
aluminum fork, but I doubt it. It'd be a good reason to avoid that bicycle.
Another reason they don't use them is because in order to make an
aluminum fork strong enough and rugged enough for a touring bicycle it'd
have to use very large diameter tubing, which would make it difficult to
mount certain kinds of low rider racks and other fork mounted accessories..
One other reason that steel is preferred for touring frames is the
availability of S&S Torque couplers for steel frames. This is a very
popular, though costly retrofit for touring bicycles. Personally I'd opt
for a the Dahon Tournado for a new touring bike if I wanted one that
could be disassembled, rather than S&S couplers. I had to laugh at the
description for the Tournado on the Dahon web site where they tout
"Grant Petersen designed forged, dual-pivot, long-reach brakes."
I remember the old Cannondale aluminum tandem which had to use such huge
diameter tubing to compensate that the joke was that they could put
access panels on the tubes so riders could use the interior for storage.
.
- References:
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: Ben C
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: SMS
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: jim beam
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: Nick L Plate
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- From: SMS
- Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- Prev by Date: Re: Wrong wrong wrong.... (ON topic)
- Next by Date: Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- Previous by thread: Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- Next by thread: Re: Inexpensive bike for both touring and off road
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|