Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: Ben C <spamspam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:28:18 -0500
On 2008-04-26, jim beam <spamvortex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ben C wrote:[...]
For inbound spokes it won't though-- they get a tensile loading on the
inside of the bend in use, where there is the small tensile residual.
Although not the highest region of tensile residual, it still might
accelerate fatigue that starts on the surface due to a surface
imperfection. I think that's Cole's point.
peter cole is just fixated on the fact that because there may be a
residual stress, there will definitely be fatigue. which is not the
case here because it's not observed to be initiating in that high
residual zone.
Well I think you're right about that.
But I'm not sure Peter Cole has claimed the presence of residual stress
means there will definitely be fatigue (premature fatigue that is-- that
there will be fatigue in cyclically loaded aluminium is as certain as
death and taxes).
But Brandt _does_ appear to claim that residual stress causes spoke
failure and that stabilization works by stress-relieving. That's a step
too far for me.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: jim beam
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- References:
- spoke fatigue troll
- From: jim beam
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: Ben C
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: jim beam
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: Ben C
- Re: spoke fatigue troll
- From: jim beam
- spoke fatigue troll
- Prev by Date: Re: headlight recommend?
- Next by Date: Re: Do Shimano SPD road pedal clips fit on Mtn Bike shoes?
- Previous by thread: Re: spoke fatigue troll
- Next by thread: Re: spoke fatigue troll
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|