Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Ben C <spamspam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2008 02:23:40 -0600
On 2008-01-02, Michael Press <rubrum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article[...]
<slrnfnlfmt.56f.spamspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
[...]
And cyclic strain is almost non-existant on a properly tensioned
spoke.
In the spoke's elastic regime the cyclic strain is
independent of spoke tension.
Not if the whole spoke flexes outwards because it's gone completely
slack.
I said "in the spoke's elastic regime."
Is that not good enough?
Well I suppose I'll allow it.
The point is, given that the strain is independent of spoke tension in
the elastic regime, I thought Clare was probably talking about flexing
and that perhaps you hadn't considered that interpretation.
What is the definition of strain?
As you know perfectly well I meant the cyclic strain. The change in
strain depends on the change in tension, not on the absolute tension,
provided the tension remains in the "elastic regime".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: jim beam
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- References:
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Ben C
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Ben C
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- From: Michael Press
- Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- Prev by Date: Re: Big Book of Weird British Bike Frames
- Next by Date: Re: How to descend... FAST
- Previous by thread: Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- Next by thread: Re: Wheel building Q of loctite variety
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
