Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: Peter Cole <peter_cole@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 11:09:41 -0400
carlfogel@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:38:15 -0400, Peter Cole
<peter_cole@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Frank Drackman wrote:"jim beam" <spamvortex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:mZSdnW2KsY96yWPbnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxAnd completely wrong, it's not what the book says at all.Ryan Cousineau wrote:I guess that we all saw that coming...sadIn article <1191039479.922619.176200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,/a/ book.
BigJulie <julianshapiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
sutherland'sAt a much lower price, Zinn and the Art of Mountain Bike Maintenance (and the similar Road Bike Maintenance) are good Chilton-level books. I'd just get the one for your primary kind of ride, as much of the material overlaps, and the differences aren't liable to catch you out unless you're a roadie and you decide to start doing your own fork maintenance on your MTB.
http://www.amazon.com/Sutherlands-Handbook-bicycle-mechanics-Sutherland/dp/091
4578065/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-4791940-4852967?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1191039436&sr=8-2
On Sep 29, 12:05 am, Mark <mblackwell1...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Well as I am increasingly intrigued by the mechanics of bikes. There
is a lot I just have never taken apart, put back together, and frankly
don't fully understand how things work. I wondered if there is a book
that is accepted as "the book to have on bike maintenance" that shows
pictures and step by step instructions much the way the Chiltons book
does for auto repair.
I'd also be interested in books on bike design. Now I would like to
keep the theory to a practical level. No I have no idea to turn this
into an engineering project. I am already married to an engineer and
the last thing one needs is two engineers in the same house. lol
Sheldonbrown.com seems like it has directions on virtually every mechanical repair known to cycling, so it's almost as good as having your own bike manual.
I make no submission on most bike design books, but regular contributor here Jobst Brandt literally wrote the book
on bicycle wheels, called "The Bicycle Wheel," and it covers both the theory of wheels and the proper procedure for wheelbuilding.procedure, yes. theory? some of it is badly awry. spoke tension "as high as the rim can bear" for example is based on a fundamental misunderstanding by the author and that is of the most practical [and costly] consequence to the novice builder - excess tension can cause a higher propensity for rim buckling and directly cause rim cracking. the book should should be amended to specify spoke tension "as determined by the rim manufacturer".
Dear Peter,
Here's what the 3rd edition says:
FINDING THE RIGHT TENSION
The following method works well in determining proper spoke tension
for conventional road rims of up to 43 0 grams with 36 spokes. Tighten
all the spokes a quarter turn at a time, starting at the valve stem
hole. Once a distinct tone can be made by plucking, and spokes are not
easily squeezed together by grasping them in pairs, it is time to
check tension. After each round of tightening, test the tension by
stress relieving. If the wheel becomes untrue in two large waves
during stress relieving, the maximum, safe tension has been exceeded.
Approach this tension carefully to avoid major rim distortions. When
the wheel loses alignment from stress relieving, loosen all spokes a
half turn before retruing the wheel
Cheers,
Carl Fogel
Yes, I know, I have that edition.
It also describes, in a previous section "Final Tensioning", use of a tensiometer (with drawing), and comparison by tone to a known good wheel as methods of achieving proper tension.
In the context, the method described above is given as an alternative with the stated qualifications (<430g, 36 spokes), presumably for those without tensiometers.
He goes on to say that for heavy rims or road rims with less than 32 spokes that tensioning is usually at the limit when nipples can no longer be easily turned.
The overall impression I get is that Jobst is trying to give people a feel for how tight spokes should be. It seems obvious that, for rims where the manufacturer has specified a maximum spoke tension, those limits should be observed, and a tensiometer is required to do that.
From its online manual, Mavic indicates that conventional 3 cross wheels should have tensions in the 70-90kg range. They also set weight limits on their road wheels (2008) for 100kg, bike rider & gear. Both seem low. Perhaps wheel builders using Mavic product should read the fine print carefully and never build without a tensiometer.
It would be interesting to know what the actual tension would be if the quoted procedure was followed for the kind of rim described. As far as I know, no one has reported that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: jim beam
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- References:
- Maintenance Manuals
- From: Mark
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: BigJulie
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: Ryan Cousineau
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: jim beam
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: Frank Drackman
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: Peter Cole
- Re: Maintenance Manuals
- From: carlfogel
- Maintenance Manuals
- Prev by Date: OT Capitalism (was: Steel Frame Breakage Redux)
- Next by Date: Re: the AIM of LIFE
- Previous by thread: Re: Maintenance Manuals
- Next by thread: Re: Maintenance Manuals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|