Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: jim beam <spamvortex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 22:08:54 -0700
Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" (who?) anonymously wrote:Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman wrote:"jim beam" (who?) anonymously wrote:i've not seen formal comparisons published, but let's examine what we know about dura-ace from public data:...
indeed, but it's still not as good as seamless tube. like sora is not as good as dura-ace. arguably, they both work the same, but one has higher ultimate limits in terms of strength, lightness and fatigue....
Does Dura-Ace really provide greater strength and fatigue resistance (a citation of test results would be useful here), or merely lighter weight and better finish (particularly when compared to Ultegra and 105)?
1. dura-ace failures reported on r.b.t - i'm still on the fingers of one hand. given the sheer volume of product and time in service, that's a very important qualitative indicator.
How many failures of Ultegra and 105 have been reported? Surely, these have sold in greater quantities than Dura-Ace?
in the u.s., that's debatable! and are they used for the same mileage? serious cyclists that put in the big miles generally don't use low end groupos.
2. it's cold forged - the ultimate for strength and fatigue resistance.
3. surface finish is superb - again, best fatigue performance.
every single design element of dura-ace is the best that it can be. given that the other groupos are not cold forged and are clearly distinguishable in terms of finish or deliberately reserve scope for improvement, i'm very confident of that ranking.
However, Dura-Ace parts are lighter than Ultegra and 105, which will compromise fatigue life.
So, is there any data beyond speculation?
fatigue is a matter of design, execution and materials. on all three counts, the "speculation" accords with known factors that are /proven/ to mitigate fatigue. what's next - trying to prove that ignoring design execution and materials /doesn't/ affect fatigue?
.
- References:
- Frame cracked - should the warranty cover this?
- From: atri . ind
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: * * Chas
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: A Muzi
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: * * Chas
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: jim beam
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: Chalo
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: A Muzi
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: Ted Bennett
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: jim beam
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: John Thompson
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: jim beam
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: jim beam
- Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- From: Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman
- Frame cracked - should the warranty cover this?
- Prev by Date: Re: Frame cracked - should the warranty cover this?
- Next by Date: Re: 650B update - Its coming!
- Previous by thread: Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- Next by thread: Re: Frame cracked - differences in tubing brands
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading