Re: question of principle
- From: Michael Press <rubrum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 04:03:59 GMT
In article <Wv-dnalEhc_eR9bbnZ2dnUVZ_rSjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jim beam <spamvortex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
G.T. wrote:
jim beam wrote:well, the answer is c. it would be a. if the notch was longitudinal, b.
G.T. wrote:
jim beam wrote:nope, it's definitely one of the above. c'mon, i've kept it pretty
ok, let's see who's awake.
imagine i have a strip of extruded 6106 aluminum bar 1" wide 1/4"
thick and 12" long. it's unanodized and effectively free of surface
defects.
then, imagine i machine a sharp 1/16" wide "v" notch in the middle
of the bar to a depth of 50% thickness. finally, i load the bar in
4-point loading with the two outer load points 1/4" from the ends
and the two middle load points centered and 2" apart. the notch is
on the tensile side with respect to load.
now, at what stress will the bar yield? is it:
a. ~100% of un-notched strength?
b. <50% of un-notched strength?
c. er, don't know?
Easy. None of the above.
Greg
simple - it's just a question about the influence of notching [and by
extension, surface cracking] on failure.
I'm going with the obvious but I'm sure you're going to say (a).
Greg
if transverse, but since the orientation of the notch is not stated, the
correct answer is c.
the point is, all this b.s. about anodizing cracking completely fails to
address this fundamental principle. if the cracks [or notches] are not
aligned such that stress is magnified at their root, they have little or
no effect. since we see cracking rigidly adhere to the extrusion axis,
/regardless/ of anodizing crack orientation, it's obvious, to anyone
that understands this basic principle at any rate, that it must be a
material issue, not anodizing.
Nipples stress the material around the spoke hole both tangential
to the spoke hole and radially to the spoke hole. IMNSHO HTH HAND
--
Michael Press
.
- References:
- question of principle
- From: jim beam
- Re: question of principle
- From: G.T.
- Re: question of principle
- From: jim beam
- Re: question of principle
- From: G.T.
- Re: question of principle
- From: jim beam
- question of principle
- Prev by Date: Re: A Hard Lesson(s) Learned
- Next by Date: Re: Increase trail or longer front center
- Previous by thread: Re: question of principle
- Next by thread: Re: question of principle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|