Re: The secrets of Armstrong
- From: Espressopithecus (Java Man) <rickk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:15:52 GMT
In article <1152288689.699312.14970@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
KingGeorgeXLI@xxxxxxxx says...
Again you do not dispute the fact that it is a rare cancer- we haveI think your original statement was misleading.
already discussed the statistics, and young men rarely get cancer,
regardless of which of those rare events is the commonest- but instead
say it does not prove the claim that I explicitly said I was not
making. How weird is that?
I inferred (perhaps incorrectly) from your original post on the subject
that you're suggesting there may be a connection between Armstrong's
"rare" testicular cancer and drug use.
You are correct that testicular cancer is a rare DISEASE. But among
cancers affecting young men, it is not a rare CANCER -- in fact, it is
the most common cancer affecting young men.
Rick
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The secrets of Armstrong
- From: 41
- Re: The secrets of Armstrong
- Prev by Date: Re: And the advantage is?
- Next by Date: Re: Three wheel tandem?
- Previous by thread: Re: The secrets of Armstrong
- Next by thread: Re: The secrets of Armstrong
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|