Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: jim beam <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 07:57:51 -0700
Joe Riel wrote:
jim beam <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:no endurance limit means it's impossible to eliminate fatigue. only use of a material /with/ an endurance limit like mild steel, /not/ stainless steel, can do that.
the part that's hard to understand is why [...]
witchcraft like spoke
squeezing is so readily accepted by non-engineers as a fatigue
eliminator in a material that fundamentally can't have such a property
because it doesn't exhibit any known endurance limit.
What does endurance limit have to do with it? Are you saying that no
form of stress relief (say annealing) can affect the fatigue
resistance of stainless-steel? Or just that mechanical
"stress-relief" (via overload and relaxation) cannot?
endurance limit is significant also because materials that have that property also exhibit strain aging. and the theory presented in "the book" and as "explained" here many times, relies on deforming the material under this strain aging regime. but stainless spokes don't strain age. continued deformation if the material is not strain aging simply increases dislocation density, a known factor in fatigue nucleation.
regarding the efficacy of mechanical stress relief, we have several problems, not least of which is the fact that we're dealing with highly worked cold drawn steel wire that /relies/ on its deformation history for its strength. yes, it can be mechanically stress relieved to some extent, but the strain necessary to cause that is typically cited at being in the 1% - 2% range /immediately after/ initial deformation - waiting a few hours or days, before performing further work adds to internal stress, it doesn't mitigate it. besides, we're not able to cause strain of that magnitude with a manual squeeze [and we wouldn't want it anyway given the permanent spoke elongation it would cause] and we're performing the act weeks or months after initial formation.
bottom line practical reality; electron microscopy of real world fatigue fracture surfaces show cracks always initiate at surface defects or inclusions. mitigation of these initiators, inclusions by vacuum degassing and by attention to surface finish quality, have a significant effect on fatigue life. some vague unquantifiable hand waving from a guy whose book contains multiple fundamental errors and that alleges as his sole "evidence" to have 300,000 miles on a pair of wheels where hubs, rims and [after much probing reluctantly admits] spokes have all been replaced, does not.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: Peter Cole
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: 41
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- References:
- Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: Bob
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: Arno Welzel
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: jobst . brandt
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: jim beam
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: Vee
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: jim beam
- Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- From: Joe Riel
- Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wife & Whether to Helmet or not to Helmet
- Next by Date: Re: Cheap chains from WallyWorld - Update
- Previous by thread: Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- Next by thread: Re: Broke another spoke. Fix or get new wheel?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading