Re: Vibration damping
- From: "Scott" <hendricks_scott@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Dec 2005 05:00:51 -0800
Dan Connelly wrote:
> frkrygow@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > The elastomer does not absorb energy if it does not deform. And, to
> > give more detail, if it deforms only a negligible amount, it absorbs
> > only a negligible amount of energy.
>
> It can absorb at relative high frequencies, where at a given energy density,
> the deformation magnitude is less: deformation at a given energy density is
> inversely proportion to the square of the frequency. The Zertz is
> a low-pass filter with a relatively high cut-off frequency.
>
>
> Dan
Dan,
I'm not aiming this at you directly, so don't take offense... but your
response to Frank's statement reminded me of a saying one of my bosses
used to say, and it applies to this entire thread.
It's like "we're trying to pick the fly *** out of the pepper."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Dan Connelly
- Re: Vibration damping
- References:
- Vibration damping
- From: Dan
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: dvt
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Werehatrack
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Sandy
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Werehatrack
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Sandy
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Werehatrack
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Sandy
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Werehatrack
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: jim beam
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Mark Hickey
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Benjamin Lewis
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: jim beam
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: frkrygow
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: jim beam
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: frkrygow
- Re: Vibration damping
- From: Dan Connelly
- Vibration damping
- Prev by Date: Re: Latex and lightweight tubes -- lower RR?
- Next by Date: Re: How tight should hub skewers be?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vibration damping
- Next by thread: Re: Vibration damping
- Index(es):
Loading