Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: frkrygow@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 23 Oct 2005 09:48:13 -0700
jim beam wrote:
> Joe Riel wrote:
> > jim beam <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> >
> >>>BTW, I knew a dean of engineering who was famous for saying "There
> >>>are
> >>>only three basic princples in engineering: F = m * a, E = i * R ,
> >>>and you can't push a rope."
> >>
> >>don't you mean V=I.R?
> >
> >
> > "E" was once commonly used as a symbol for electrical potential. It
> > may make more sense than using "V", which (also) stands for the units
> > (volts) of the potential.
> >
> > Joe
>
> it still is, but only in the context of batteries & the like [where it
> stands for "EMF"]. i've been an amateur electronic hobbyist for 33
> years and i've /never/ seen ohm's law written as "E=iR", always V=IR.
Q. E. D.
- Frank Krygowski
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: jim beam
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- References:
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: 41
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: Phil Holman
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: gcmschemist@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: James Annan
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: gcmschemist@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: James Annan
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: gcmschemist@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: James Annan
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: gcmschemist@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: frkrygow
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: gcmschemist@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: frkrygow
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: jim beam
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: frkrygow
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: jim beam
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- From: jim beam
- Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- Prev by Date: Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- Next by Date: Re: Eyebrow tweezers as a bike tool
- Previous by thread: Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- Next by thread: Re: disk brake debate - summary II
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|