Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- From: Bill C <tritonrider@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 08:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
On May 13, 10:16 am, Nobody<nob...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 13 May 2008 06:00:55 -0700 (PDT), Bill C
<tritonri...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I used cycling as the primary, non-impact, tool for keeping
the metabolism up, and fat burning.
How much did you lose, over what period of time?
What was your speed pre and post loss?
Just curious.
Figures I've seen suggest only 85% of loss is pure fat, unless
genetically superior, or on PEDs.
I wasn't racing bicycles then much, I was doing some duathlons, but
mostly power lifting/BB stuff. My weight bounced from 215/225
depending on how much I was focused on power during that large cycle.
heavier when going into a lifting competition of something like that,
down to 185 at around 5% bodyfat for BB which was about my best, and I
stayed in those ranges for about 10 years since I am not genetically
gifted. Coming down from 225 was probably 4 months, 215 about 3 when
trying to retain muscle. There was definitley a strength loss when
coming down, but power to weight wasn't a factor there. Neither was
extended aerobic power. I'd have to dig through my old training logs
for times on a, roughly, 45 minute TT I used to do regularly about
once every other week, which would be the only ride that day, just to
shake up the training and try and correlate it with the weight and
bodyfat levels which I have somewhere. Memory says I was slightly
faster going down to about 10lbs from the goal, then in that last
10lbs, which I always had a miserable time with, getting slower, and
losing more in the gym too.
Unfortunately the last of this is close to 10 years ago now when the
injuries started catching up with me so the details aren't real sharp
without digging logs out.
I have managed to put on muscle while maintaining the bodyfat level
but it's a lot slower than taking some fat with the muscle gain.
keeping the muscle while losing the fat is, easily, the hardest thing
to do in BB. That's why there are so many drugs used out there,
especially, once your close, diuretics that help get rid of the excess
water "puffiness" from the steroids for razor sharp "cuts". At the
"pro" level, around show times, peoples electrolyte levels and body
chemistry is frequently, totally screwed up resulting in massive
cramping onstage, or in back, one top five type had to literally be
carried off stage and taken to the hospital, and trips to the
hospital, or EMT and then hospital from this crap.
I think most competitive cyclists, that have been racing for a few
years, are close enough, and knowledgeable enough that big gains are
going to be really hard to come by. As others have said a few percent
that is sustainable is a big gain.
From talking to good cycling trainers I don't think the small bf/
weight changes are going to be a big thing if Ryan is looking for more
power/sprinting. More a different structure to the training.
Bill C
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- From: Nobody
- Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- References:
- Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- From: Nobody
- Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- Prev by Date: Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- Next by Date: Re: Yet another boring race report
- Previous by thread: Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- Next by thread: Re: Training Qs: intervals, blowing up, fat...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading