Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:55:22 -0800
<bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:21924f9b-3920-4036-84fc-c23517866349@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
No. You made this ridiculous claim, so _you_
post a citation to an article in "physics journals."
Not "and such," either.
Somehow I'm not surprised that you don't know anything about the Superconducting Super Collider costs and the estimations that it was too small for a power producing station.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: William Asher
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- References:
- OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: Tom Kunich
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: William Asher
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: Tom Kunich
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: Mike Jacoubowsky
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: SLAVE of THE STATE
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: Tom Kunich
- Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- From: bjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT Is anyone really surprised?
- Next by Date: Re: OT Is anyone really surprised?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- Next by thread: Re: OT Why No Fusion Powerplants?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
