Re: Checkmate, Atheists!

On Dec 7, 2:07 pm, "Tom Kunich" <cyclintom@yahoo. com> wrote:
<b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
You read it somewhere. That's fine; so did I. Nobody
pretends that we have a physical theory that works at
such short times and high energies. The rest of physical
cosmology explains what happens after that.

Here's the bottom line - you claim that religionists are crazy for believing
that God created everything out of nothing. Instead you believe a theory
that claims that the universe was created out of nothing by nothing.
And you just don't get it do you?

I didn't say anything about God. I don't think the existence
or absence of a big bang theory says anything about God,
positive or negative. I only intervened in this thread when
you started misleading people about your knowledge of
physics, which you consistently refuse to back up when asked.

Apparently you don't know what "local" is? How far can we see? How do we
know what the universe is like outside of our sphere of observation? Since
the physics is plain - you cannot create matter without creating an equal
amount of antimatter you either need to explain where all of the antimatter
is or admit that perhaps science isn't all knowing.

You're wrong about the antimatter. At very high energies, at
t~10^-33 sec, small violations in charge-parity symmetry in
most reasonable high-energy theories, combined with non-
equilibrium conditions, can produce a baryon asymmetry,
generating a high matter/antimatter ratio. Chapter 6
"Baryogenesis" of Kolb & Turner's book "The Early Universe"
goes over this in detail. Beyond that it's really out of my
expertise.

I asked about "local" because you claimed the Hubble law
for the expansion was only a local phenomenon. You seem
to have defined "local" as "within the observable universe."
Within that area, the expansion is valid and the existence
of the expansion plus background radiation implies an
early hot dense phase, for which you still haven't told us your
alternative explanation. I hope it has something to do with
the fifth force of nature, the Kunich force, which is only
measurable by SRM cranks.

Ben
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
    ... > scientists attempt and cannot construct a harmonious pattern of the ... > expansion, Earth is a part of universe - this means, the regularities ... > physics either in mathematics. ... 'subduction' - in fact ALL the terminology of plate tectonics ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: "Tired" light
    ... the accelerated expansion is a mere hypothesis. ... I pointed out that I neglect the acceleration in my argument ... >> twin paradox, in an expanding universe, Terence is not at rest ... As I said, he works in particle physics, not cosmology. ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: I need a philosophical opinion ...
    ... little thesis My maths skills are borken ... I do physics to remedy that. ... There is only so much energy in a system (say a universe, ... By this I mean that energy used to induce expansion rate ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: plate tectonics
    ... One look at the physics of Earth movement or even ... Expansion cannot explain how it could possibly have ... > shallow marine deposits on continents throughout most geologic time. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)