Re: Dynepo

On Sep 28, 10:53 pm, benn.trov...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sep 28, 10:51 am, Marty <m_p...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/28092007/58/tour-de-france-rasmussen-sc...

So, they can't say he failed a drug test because they are not certain
the non-negative was due to this Dynepo stuff. Is that correct?
--
Marty

I understood from the Equipe article that they can't declare him
positive because the specific criteria for positivity were drawn up
before the availability of dynepo and other forms of epo derived from
human sources. In other words, he gets off on what the law'n'order
folks might call a technicality.

And the article also says that the CB lab doesn't have a test for
Dynepo, but
somehow he tested positive for it.... just more slander by the CB
lab.
Throw some mud on the wall and see if it sticks.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dynepo
    ... the non-negative was due to this Dynepo stuff. ... I understood from the Equipe article that they can't declare him ... positive because the specific criteria for positivity were drawn up ... The technicality being that WADA perhaps isn't so Pound-sure of its ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Dynepo
    ... the non-negative was due to this Dynepo stuff. ... I understood from the Equipe article that they can't declare him ... positive because the specific criteria for positivity were drawn up ... human sources. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Dynepo
    ... they can't say he failed a drug test because they are not certain ... the non-negative was due to this Dynepo stuff. ... positive because the specific criteria for positivity were drawn up ... folks might call a technicality. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)