Re: Scientific American on Landis and Testosterone

On Aug 29, 6:46 pm, "dustoyev...@xxxxxxx" <dustoyev...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 29, 1:46 pm, Feld <bafel...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=84EC9327-E7F2-99DF-3275E...

I'm wondering how much "improved mood" it would take to get a mule, or
an exhausted rider who did poorly on immed. previous stage(s) over
that mountain like a racehorse.

I still haven't seen anyone counter Kunich's assertion that the
differing results from A and B ("other half of the A"?) test is proof
positive, if you'll excuse the expression, of contamination at the lab
(or elsewhere) (that's two, two swipes-- one at the lab and one at the
"chain of posession") (without mentioning whiteout or lack of
"blinds"). --D-y

I think TK has been pretty much on the money, even if there is
argument about the details, on this whole subject. Lot's of people
piss on it because it's Tom then say the same thing in another way,
except for those who believe in the divinity of ***.
Bill C

.

Quantcast