Re: POUND AS KING
- From: "dustoyevsky@xxxxxxx" <dustoyevsky@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:23:52 -0700
On Jun 10, 9:37 am, Simon Brooke <s...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
in message <1181477387.107995.319...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
dustoyev...@xxxxxxx ('dustoyev...@xxxxxxx') wrote:
"Demo's". Instantly understood.
By greengrocers. If you want a plural of 'demo', that's 'demos'. Yes, it
happens to have the same spelling as the completely different Greek
word 'demos', but so what. Apostrophe 'S' is a possessive. What is it that
you are saying that demo owns?
I'm not saying demo owns anything. I'm saying demo's is a contraction
made plural-- at least for one audience <g> who wants to stickle.
(That's two, two, two asterisks for one!)
For others, who just want to read and understand, the apostrophe plays
a wonderful role in differentiating between demos and demo's, two
entirely different real word meanings.
There are places where the apostrophe works well for this; others
(Apple's for Sale) where it doesn't.
(I noted, somewhat pointedly):
But, of course, everybody is entitled to their opinion. --D-y
(SB replied):
Education helps.
Indeed. I found my old Grammar 360 course very liberating.
"Hypercorrection" was one notable topic. Martha Kolln's text among
those referenced, some fine contributions from her.
Anyhow: One "usage rules" question is: descriptive or prescriptive?
Another usage question is: what context are we in here? Publishing, or
conversing?
IRT your "greengrocers" comment, above, my grammar teacher's retort to
such assertions was: "Don't pretend you didn't understand!" Because
you did, you know? Um, besides seeming a little short on basic regard
for your fellow travellers, Mr Brooke... (What worth hath a man?
Another area of investigation.)
How many centuries *did* it take to get a gender-neutral third-person
possessive into the language, anyhow? Phew, glad to see that "their"
usage (nyuck nyuck! I liked that one!) taking a rightful, functional
place; it was a hell of a struggle! So many ready volunteers swarming
at the ramparts, don't you know!
Again, same thing for the poor apostrophe-- if the basic argument for
standardization of usage is clarity, clarity trumps standardization.
All IMHO, of course. --D-y
.
- References:
- POUND AS KING
- From: datakoll
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: Carlos
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: Tom Kunich
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: RonSonic
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: Simon Brooke
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: RonSonic
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: dustoyevsky@xxxxxxx
- Re: POUND AS KING
- From: Simon Brooke
- POUND AS KING
- Prev by Date: Teutenberg wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Teutenberg wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: POUND AS KING
- Next by thread: Re: POUND AS KING
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|