Re: Landis, continued
- From: "steve" <steve@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 18:58:31 GMT
On 17-May-2007, smacked up and reeling, "Sandy" <leurre@xxxxxxxx> blindly
formulated
the following incoherence:
That would be an improvement over the currentNo - but if you want to convict and imprison molecules, and not examine
protocol, dont you agree?
whether someone actually cheated, go ahead.
Convict molecules?
Are you suggesting that there are not (or never will be?) scientific tests
that can inform us about a riders drug use? Impossible?
Assuming for the sake of argument that the test itself is valid
They aren't, so I will not assume.
Ah, so you are opposed to rational discussion. Enough said, I think.
steve
--
"The accused will now make a bogus statement."
James Joyce
.
- References:
- Landis, continued
- From: Sandy
- Re: Landis, continued
- From: RicodJour
- Re: Landis, continued
- From: steve
- Re: Landis, continued
- From: Sandy
- Re: Landis, continued
- From: steve
- Re: Landis, continued
- From: Sandy
- Landis, continued
- Prev by Date: Re: Landis, continued
- Next by Date: LeMond to Testify Against Landis
- Previous by thread: Re: Landis, continued
- Next by thread: Re: Landis, continued
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|