Re: This proves it: Landis is innocent

In article <462e0840$0$10442$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Sandy" <leurre@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dans le message de news:u40s23lf5tmcpsnlgm74jh78do4utk6ggm@xxxxxxx,
Mark Hickey <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :
"Sandy" <leurre@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dans le message de news:132qh89knifdg9f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Ken Prager <prager@xxxxxxxx> a réfléchi, et puis a déclaré :
Why else would LNDD keep out his representative *and* leak the
results (again)???

<http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=news/2007/apr07/apr23news3>

Within that same story, you will find that they did so as instructed
by USADA, or so CN says. As to leaking, this is not an "again" at
all. They did not previously leak results.

Then perhaps you could explain how Landis was confronted DURING the
tour by the media about the results of his positive test, rather than
by UCI / WADA.... hmmmmm?

I take it this was a smart-alecky "hmmmmm", yes?
Forgetting whether it was Pound or not, I do recall one of the hoity-toities
saying that there was a positive test result, and characterizing it as
something like "... and it couldn't be worse." Paraphrasing - I don't
recall perfectly. That's how I explain it.

It was Pat McQuaid who announced that an unnamed rider had tested
positive. He said, on record, that he announced the positive test
result to prevent Chatenay-Malabry laboratory from leaking the
result.


I am neither for the lab nor against
Landis ; but please rely on facts, not gossip.

You need to bolster your collection of facts, it appears.

No, I don't, or at least not to a non-paying non-client. For a substatial
fee, of course, I would be happy to do the legwork, but someone in the forum
will likely volunteer. Of course, if _you_ know precisely who it was who
disclosed the first inklings, I am sure you will let us all know.

--
Michael Press
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Forbidden performance enhancing substances
    ... Millar was caught red handed so he had to fess up, Landis on the other ... The facts ... Are you sure he was doping and just screwed ... the exception of the evidence represented by the "positive test", ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: This proves it: Landis is innocent
    ... I take it this was a smart-alecky "hmmmmm", ... saying that there was a positive test result, ... Landis; but please rely on facts, ... You need to bolster your collection of facts, ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: This proves it: Landis is innocent
    ... I take it this was a smart-alecky "hmmmmm", ... saying that there was a positive test result, ... Landis; but please rely on facts, ... You need to bolster your collection of facts, ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: the real issue in the Jones case
    ... very specific facts of THIS case. ... There's no reason to believe the case ... >> criteria, it's a false positive, or a positive test doesn't prove ... There is no such thing as a Lyme community, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
  • Re: This proves it: Landis is innocent
    ... Landis; but please rely on facts, ... The UCI announced that 'a rider' had failed a drug test after stage 17. ... So the lab didn't leak the results of the positive test on the 'A' sample. ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)