Re: And The Weight Goes On
- From: "B. Lafferty" <Magni@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:44:18 GMT
"Jet" <jj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:14cqj1h6m6b8ms9vrr8rakvjhc1bu6pb0l@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:12:26 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <Magni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_09
>>
>>http://www.cyclingnews.com/news.php?id=photos/2005/news/sep05/tourofhope/lance_tdhope_02
>
> So how does criticizing his weight fit into your anti-doping agenda? He
> looks about 175, not bad for 5'11".
Who said I was criticizing? That's your stupid, knee jerk response. I think
he does look better. Now if we could get Rasmussen to gain some
weight........
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: And The Weight Goes On
- From: Neil Brooks
- Re: And The Weight Goes On
- References:
- And The Weight Goes On
- From: B. Lafferty
- Re: And The Weight Goes On
- From: Jet
- And The Weight Goes On
- Prev by Date: Re: Truth or Something Less
- Next by Date: Re: And The Weight Goes On
- Previous by thread: Re: And The Weight Goes On
- Next by thread: Re: And The Weight Goes On
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|