Re: Donati On Armstrong


<moorehead_johnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125515157.040622.14540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> B. Lafferty wrote:
>> Note what he says about the validity of the French lab's test.
>>
>> http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050831/sp_wl_afp/cyclinggerusadoping_050831172817
>
>
> I don't see Donati's comment about the validity of the French lab's
> test anywhere in this article. I do see Donati making a series of
> almost unbelievably ignorant and factless statements....for example,
> this one - "No one could achieve what Armstrong has achieved taking EPO
> on its own. EPO improves your breathing capacity. But you also need
> other substances, such as anabolics, testosterone and a lot of others.
> S'cuse me? Donati is saying that Armstrong was positive not only for
> EPO but for steroids and testosterone "in the last few years"? That IS
> news, particularly since the L'Equip story only relates to ONE half of
> a sample, tested only for EPO, and only for 1999. In other words,
> Donati is a Lance basher, and he just likes making *** up.
>
> Lance won every tour because he rode harder, trained harder, and in a
> few cases, was just plain lucky (Ulrich's crash during the TT in the
> 2003 Tour, for example).
>
> Lance has proven unequivocally that the one-balled man is king in the
> land of the balless, and the Frogs hate him for it.
>
> mj

>From the article above:

"The documents printed by L'Equipe are very damaging but also
unquestionable. But the paper's own position is much less clear," said
Donati.


>


.

Quantcast