Re: "Reason to shut up"
- From: "Philip Holman" <namlohip@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 07:54:52 -0700
"David Ferguson" <Zeds_Dead70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:25hpe1dr52pql11t2i386doek7opkevdgi@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 04:36:55 GMT, Michael Press <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>In article <bg8oe1ha6oae1lia79nufqi0225sqk9lbr@xxxxxxx>,
>> David Ferguson <Zeds_Dead70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:32:35 GMT, "B. Lafferty" <Magni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >"Torched Smurf" <torched_smurf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> >news:1122685257.225926.223600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >> Because it's over, and he's gone. Time to move on...
>>> >>
>>> >> -Smurf
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >It isn't over by a long shot, Smurfball.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> It's not over because you'll never let it be over.
>>>
>>> I can't wait for the trial so we can hear your babblings every day.
>>>
>>> With baited breath....
>>
>>Red worms or minnows?
>
>
> Neither, just being a sarcastic dumbass and not expecting a response.
And so was Michael. It's bated as in abated.
Phil H
.
- References:
- "Reason to shut up"
- From: Torched Smurf
- Re: "Reason to shut up"
- From: B. Lafferty
- Re: "Reason to shut up"
- From: David Ferguson
- Re: "Reason to shut up"
- From: Michael Press
- "Reason to shut up"
- Prev by Date: Re: Social Change and childhood obesity
- Next by Date: Re: "It's Not About the Drugs"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Reason to shut up"
- Next by thread: Re: "Reason to shut up"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|