Re: Article from "The Week"

"k.papai" wrote:
>
> "Do you really understand the fundamentals of Chaos Theory?"
>
> I think I understand the basics, so yes.
> Why do you think I wouldn't? (Math has always been one of my favorite
> subjects)
>
> I even programmed some fractal generating graphic routines in C about
> 15 years ago.

Did you just copy the code? (I did):

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1558510389/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1558510974/



Fractals have real-world apps:

http://www.fractenna.com/faq/faq.html

There used to be some nice graphics there, but I can't find them.


But here...:

http://www-tsc.upc.es/eef/research_lines/antennas/fractals/fractal_antennas.htm

http://classes.yale.edu/fractals/Panorama/ManuFractals/FractalAntennas/FractalAntennas.html

Other crap:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/01/020131073853.htm
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/02/040203232954.htm



Now I have to figure out how to incorporate all this into bar room
pick-up lines.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Article from "The Week"
    ... Mad Dog wrote: ... >>> Do you really understand the fundamentals of Chaos Theory? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Article from "The Week"
    ... >> Do you really understand the fundamentals of Chaos Theory? ... Common misconceptions. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Article from "The Week"
    ... >"Do you really understand the fundamentals of Chaos Theory?" ... >I think I understand the basics, ... (Math has always been one of my favorite ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Article from "The Week"
    ... >Pure Genus. ... Do you really understand the fundamentals of Chaos Theory? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Question: Given |X|>0 and |Y|>0, can X x Y be empty?
    ... you do not have the basics necessary to use it. ... attempts will only succeed in confusing you, and will not lead you to ... those fundamentals directly. ... Just because you use the same notation does not mean it is ...
    (sci.logic)