Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: "Sorni" <sornonispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:07:54 GMT
Tom Keats wrote:
In article <iwUmg.3871$MF6.2358@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Sorni" <sornonispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Peter Cole wrote:^^^^^^
<http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=11676>
"WASHINGTON -- There is sufficient evidence from tree rings,
boreholes, retreating glaciers, and other "proxies" of past surface
temperatures to say with a high level of confidence that the last
few decades of the 20th century were warmer than any comparable
period in the last 400 years, according to a new report from the
National Research Council."
So the earth was warmer over 400 years ago. Fascinating.
errmm ... I think you meant to say: "cooler".
No. If the earth is warmer today than at any time in the last 400 years,
that certainly /implies/ that some time before that the earth was warmer
than today. (Otherwise, why didn't they say 600 years? Or a thousand
years?)
Anyways, AIUI there is quite comprehensive expert concensus that
global warming is indeed currently taking place. The dispute is
over the cause -- human or natural.
Indeed. And also whether unprecedented (many "real" scientists say not).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: Leo Lichtman
- Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: Rich Clark
- Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- References:
- An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: Peter Cole
- Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: Sorni
- Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- From: Tom Keats
- An inconvenient Truth -- update
- Prev by Date: Re: socks
- Next by Date: Re: socks
- Previous by thread: Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- Next by thread: Re: An inconvenient Truth -- update
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|