Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: "Roger Zoul" <rogerzoul2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:40:45 -0500
catzz66 wrote:
:: Leo Lichtman wrote:
::: "Ozark Bicycle" wrote: Imagine, a grandparent sharing his love of
::: bicycling with his grandkids.....(clip)
::: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
::: Imagine a publisher taking the OP's objection so to heart that he
::: jetissons an account bringing in thousands of dollars per month, in
::: order to keep from losing one subscriber.
:::
:::
::
:: In defense of the original poster, it isn't wrong to want to set your
:: own standards for what is appropriate for your own grandkids. I
:: kind of admire that, even though his protest may not amount to much
:: to the publisher.
That's the parents job, not the grandparents. And if he wants to share his
love of cycling with them, it's far better to ride with them than give them
this mag, which is mainly targeted at selling.
.
- References:
- Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: Lloyd Payne
- Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: Donald Gillies
- Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: bernmart
- Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: Ozark Bicycle
- Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: Leo Lichtman
- Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- From: catzz66
- Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- Prev by Date: Re: Smoking Pot and Cycling
- Next by Date: Re: International Pi Day -- 300th Anniversary of Pi
- Previous by thread: Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- Next by thread: Re: Inappropriate AD in Bicycling Magazine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
