Re: group poll; cogsets
- From: drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Drew Eckhardt)
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:22:54 -0700
In article <pan.2006.01.31.01.57.54.977393@xxxxxxx>,
David L. Johnson <david.johnson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
3x5 or 3x6 can provide a wide range of useful cogs with some
surprisingly close ratios.
At the cost of going to a triple, which is going to be more finicky about
shifting than a double.
My 30-40-50 Racing-T setup shifted faster and more smoothly than the 34-50 FSA
compact + Campagnolo compact front derailleur I replaced it with. I think the
smaller difference in chain rings helped.
I could also use all 8 cogs off any ring (about 4 gears of overlap with
the adjacent ring) without rubbing.
Before I shimmed the compact chain rings, I couldn't use the two small
cogs (one cog overlap, lots of slow ring changes). A little spacing fixed that
but upshifts to the big-ring are a little worse. Yuck.
--
<a href="http://www.poohsticks.org/drew/";>Home Page</a>
In 1913 the inflation adjusted (in 2003 dollars) exemption for single people
was $54,567, married couples' exemption $72,756, the next $363,783 was taxed
at 1%, and earnings over $9,094,578 were taxed at the top rate of 7%.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: group poll; cogsets
- From: Matt O'Toole
- Re: group poll; cogsets
- Prev by Date: Re: group poll; cogsets
- Next by Date: Re: tire/tube compatibility
- Previous by thread: Re: group poll; cogsets
- Next by thread: Re: group poll; cogsets
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
