Re: "ground cushion"
- From: "Ken S. Tucker" <dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:41:29 -0800 (PST)
On Mar 1, 8:09 am, Dudley Henriques <dhenriq...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
Technically speaking, I am an "authority" on aerodynamics
since I've been paid to write aerodynamics articles for peer
reviewed magazines, and thus, expressed my professional
opinion on the so-called "ground cushion"
I'll never quite understand how anyone gets his kicks out of posting
something that causes millions of people all over the world to start
laughing to themselves at what an idiot that person must
be......................and these people are only in the age demographic
up to Kindergarten level :-)))
Dudley Henriques
Hey Dude, try doing this in an airplane,
(I figure this spin is doable in A/C)...
++++++++++
About Electron Spin and Structure.
Let a pair of Objects O1 and O2 have a comparative
speed of V12, measured relatively to an external
observer K, and a 2nd pair of Objects O3 and O4
have a comparative velocity of V34, again relative
to K.
Relative to another observer K', V12'=/=V12 and
V34' =/=V34, however the ratio,
V12/V34 = V12'/V34', Eq.(Ratio)
is invariant. One might look at the ratio's of orbits
to see that thoses ratios are invariant, but the
periods of the orbits themselves are relative.
Allow me to set-up an electron structure such as
in this figure using charges, (charges "a" and "b"
are negative),
+
a b
too provide an apparent (-) charge.
The charges produce an energy, a*b/r = + energy,
to account for the +electron mass.
You may want to cut out a little triangle of paper,
to do the spins.
a
+
b
then
a b
+
then
a
+
b
and then return to,
+
a b
At the point we started.
The above describes the electron spin structure.
Charges "a" and "b" have twice the relative spin
as the (+) has in the ratio of (a) to (b) as (+) has
to the couple (a) and (b).
That ratio is 1/2 = intrinstic spin,
and as I pointed out above in Eq.(Ratio) that's
invariant .
Conclusion:
The mass and spin of an electron are defined.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "ground cushion"
- From: Dudley Henriques
- Re: "ground cushion"
- From: Dan_Thomas_nospam
- Re: "ground cushion"
- References:
- Re: "ground cushion"
- From: Dan_Thomas_nospam
- Re: "ground cushion"
- From: Ken S. Tucker
- Re: "ground cushion"
- From: Dudley Henriques
- Re: "ground cushion"
- Prev by Date: Re: Landing without flaps
- Next by Date: Re: "ground cushion"
- Previous by thread: Re: "ground cushion"
- Next by thread: Re: "ground cushion"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|