Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- From: "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" <mortschnerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:27:10 GMT
Jim Macklin wrote:
I have seen computerized logbooks that showed perfect
compliance with all ADs, SBs, and part 91 maintenance. Only
problem was that much of the work had not been done. Fuel
and hydraulic lines were old and leaking, mags were burnt,
but the logs were easy to read, just a bunch of lies.
That's the kind of stuff that paper administrators really go for. In nursing,
we call them "buffed charts". The old saying is, if you didn't write it, you
didn't do it. The unintended corollary is, if I wrote it, prove I *didn't* do
it.
It's all crap. Only the adminstrators seem to be unaware of it.
--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
mschnerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- From: Jim Macklin
- Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- References:
- Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- From: Cecil E. Chapman, Jr.
- Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- From: BillJ
- Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- From: Jim Macklin
- Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- Prev by Date: Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- Next by Date: Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- Previous by thread: Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- Next by thread: Re: Good News - Bad News. regarding CFI Checkride Today
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|