Cambridge 302 Security Fail

X-no-archive: yes
In article <0f77f352-9527-4dfb-920b-6fe5b9d81d5a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
s.com>, Andy <a.durbin@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes
On Dec 11, 3:45 pm, Peter Purdie <petepur...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hooked up to a PDA or PC with a terminal program. typ VER <return>.

The 302A will give a text message, concluding (if there is a bad
electronic seal) with 'Security Fail'.

If so, in UK send it to me at RD Aviation or Dickie Feakes where it can be
resealed (after checking the memory battery voltage and replacing if
necessary).

The security fail report does not indicate that the seal is bad.
Please assist Cambridge with fixing the design problem rather than
using it to solicit business!

Andy, I think you are being a little harsh.

There are (AFAIK) only two people that can handle sealing of Recorders
in UK and Peter mentions both of them. You don't solicit business by
mentioning your rivals...

There is not a lot of business to be made from re-sealing recorders, and
who is there left at Cambridge who can fix this problem with or without
assistance?

Tim Newport-Peace tnp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Indecision is the Key to Flexibility."
.

Loading