Re: Hanson

Martin Gregorie wrote:
> Indeed. S/he is the only poster to r.a.s I've ever killfiled and I hope
> s/he will be the last. I don't like right-wing rants, particularly when
> they're so full of blatantly incorrect 'facts'.

On Being Disliked
The new not-so-unwelcome anti-Americanism.

Last year the hysteria about the hostility toward the United States
reached a fevered pitch. Everyone from Jimmy Carter to our Hollywood
elite lamented that America had lost its old popularity. It was a
constant promise of the Kerry campaign to restore our good name and "to
work with our allies." The more sensitive were going to undo the
supposed damage of the last four years. Whole books have been devoted
to this peculiar new anti-Americanism, but few have asked whether or
not such suspicion of the United States is, in fact, a barometer of
what we are doing right - and while not necessarily welcome, at least
proof that we are on the correct track.

The Egyptian autocracy may have received $57 billion in aggregate
American aid over the last three decades. But that largess still does
not prevent the Mubarak dynasty from damning indigenous democratic
reformers by dubbing them American stooges. In differing ways, the
Saudi royal family exhibits about the same level of antagonism toward
the U.S. as do the Islamic fascists of al Qaeda - both deeply
terrified by what is going on in Iraq. Mostly this animus arises
because we are distancing ourselves from corrupt grandees, even as we
have become despised as incendiary democratizers by the Islamists. Is
that risky and dangerous? Yes. Bad? Hardly

At the U.N. it is said that a ruling hierarchy mistrusts the United
States and that a culture of anti-Americanism has become endemic within
the organization. No wonder - the Americans alone push for more facts
about the Oil-for-Food scandal, question Kofi Annan's breaches of
ethics, and want investigations about U.N. crimes in Africa. If we are
mistrusted for caring about those thousands who are inhumanely treated
by a supposedly humane organization, then why in the world should we
wish to be liked by such a group?

EU bureaucrats and French politicians routinely caricature Americans,
whipping up public opinion against the United States, even as they fly
here to profess eagerness to maintain the old NATO transatlantic ties.
Is it to our discredit that what Europe has now devolved into does not
like the United States?

Mexico, we are told, is furious at the United States. Mexico City
newspapers routinely trash Americans. Vicente Fox usually sounds more
like a belligerent than the occasional visitor at the presidential
ranch. That is not so bad either.

In short, who exactly does not like the United States and why? First,
almost all the 20 or so illiberal Arab governments that used to count
on American realpolitik's giving them a pass on accounting for their
crimes. They fear not the realist Europeans, nor the resource-mad
Chinese, nor the old brutal Russians, but the Americans, who alone are
prodding them to open their economies and democratize their corrupt
political cultures. We must learn to expect, not lament, their
hostility, and begin to worry that things would be indeed wrong if such
unelected dictators praised the United States.

The United Nations has sadly become a creepy organization. Its General
Assembly is full of cutthroat regimes. The Human Rights Commission has
had members like Vietnam and Sudan, regimes that at recess must fight
over bragging rights to which of the two killed more of their own
people. The U.N. has a singular propensity to find flawed men to be
secretary-general - a Kurt Waldheim, Boutros Boutros-Ghali, or Kofi
Annan. Blue-helmeted peace-keepers, we learn, are as likely to commit
as prevent crimes; and the only thing constant about such troops is
that they will never go first into harm's way in Serbia, Kosovo, the
Congo, or Dafur to stop genocide. Even worse, the U.N. has proved to be
a terrible bully, an unforgivable sin for a self-proclaimed protector
of the weak and innocent - loud false charges against Israel for its
presence in the West Bank, not a peep about China in Tibet; tough talk
about Palestinian rights, far less about offending Arabs over Darfur.
So U.N. anti-Americanism is a glowing radiation badge, proof of
exposure to toxicity.

The EU is well past being merely silly, as its vast complex of
bureaucrats tries to control what 400 million speak, eat, and think.
Its biggest concerns are three: figuring out how its nations are to
keep paying billions of euros to retirees, unemployed, and assorted
other entitlement recipients; how to continue to ankle-bite the United
States without antagonizing it to the degree that these utopians might
have to pay for their own security; and how not to depopulate itself
out of existence. Europeans sold Saddam terrible arms for oil well
after the first Gulf War. Democratic Israel or Taiwan means nothing to
them; indeed, democracy is increasingly becoming the barometer by which
to judge European hostility. Cuba, China, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah -
not all that bad; the United States, Taiwan, and Israel, not all that
good. Personally, I'd rather live in a country that goes into an
anguished national debate over pulling the plug on a lone woman than
one that blissfully vacations on the beach oblivious to 15,000 elderly
cooked to well done back in Paris.

Mexico, enjoying one of the richest landscapes in the world, can't feed
its own people, so it exports its poorest to the United States. Its own
borders with Central America are as brutal to cross as our own are
porous. Illegal aliens send back almost $50 billion, which has the
effect of propping up corrupt institutions that as a result will never
change. Given its treatment of its own people, if the Mexican
government praised the United States we should indeed be concerned.

Who then are America's friends? Perhaps one billion Indians, who
appreciated that at a time of recession we kept our economy open, and
exported jobs and expertise there that helped evolve its economy.

Millions of Japanese trust America as well. Unlike the Chinese, who on
script vandalized Japanese interests abroad in anguish over right-wing
Japanese textbooks, Americans - who at great cost once freed China
- without such violence urge the Japanese to deal honestly with the
past. After all, the Tokyo government that started the war is gone and
replaced by a democracy; in contrast, the Communist dictatorship that
killed 50 million of its own and many of its neighbors is still in
place in China. At a time when no one in Europe seems to care that
Japan is squeezed between a nuclear North Korea and a nuclear China,
the United States alone proves a reliable friend. The French, on spec,
conduct maneuvers with the ascendant Communist Chinese navy.

Eastern Europeans do not find the larger families, religiosity, or
commitment to individualism and freedom in America disturbing.
Apparently, millions in South America don't either - if their
eagerness to emigrate here is any indication.

It is the wage of the superpower to be envied. Others weaker vie for
its influence and attention - often when successful embarrassed by
the necessary obsequiousness, when ignored equally shamed at the
resulting public impotence. The Cold War is gone and former friends and
neutrals no longer constrain their anti-American rhetoric in fear of a
cutthroat and nuclear Soviet Union. Americans are caricatured as cocky
and insular - as their popular culture sweeps the globe.

All that being said, the disdain that European utopians, Arab
dictatorships, the United Nations, and Mexico exhibit toward the United
States is not - as the Kerry campaign alleged in the last election
- cause for tears, but often reason to be proud, since much of the
invective arises from the growing American insistence on principles
abroad.

America should not gratuitously welcome such dislike; but we should not
apologize for it either. Sometimes the caliber of a nation is found not
in why it is liked, but rather in why it is not. By January 1, 1941, I
suppose a majority on the planet - the Soviet Union, all of Eastern
Europe, France, Italy, Spain, and even many elsewhere in occupied
Europe, most of Latin America, Japan and its Asian empire, the entire
Arab world, many in India - would have professed a marked preference
for Hitler's Germany over Churchill's England.

Think about it. When Europe orders all American troops out; when Japan
claims our textbooks whitewash the Japanese forced internment or
Hiroshima; when China cites unfair trade with the United States; when
South Korea says get the hell off our DMZ; when India complains that we
are dumping outsourced jobs on them; when Egypt, Jordan, and the
Palestinians refuse cash aid; when Canada complains that we are not
carrying our weight in collective North American defense; when the
United Nations moves to Damascus; when the Arab Street seethes that we
are pushing theocrats and autocrats down its throat; when Mexico builds
a fence to keep us out; when Latin America proclaims a boycott of the
culturally imperialistic Major Leagues; and when the world ignores
American books, films, and popular culture, then perhaps we should be
worried. But something tells me none of that is going to happen in this
lifetime.

.

Loading