Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- From: xyzzy <xyzzy.dude@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:59:47 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 12:20 pm, es330td <es33...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 31, 10:34 am, Frank Stutzman <stutz...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:> Gig 601XL Builder <wrgiac...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And I am guessing that you don't own the building in which you work.
If thats the case I think your employer might take a dim view of this.
Or more correctly, your employers insurance carrier might take a very
dim view of this.
You are correct; I don't own the building though the building owner
does own the land (and body of water.) I figured I probably couldn't
land there, but if there was any possibility I could fly to work I
should at least find out.
that pond looks awfully small. Looks like less than 1000 feet long and
curved. You'd need to be a pretty skilled floatplane pilot to land
and takeoff there.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- From: es330td
- Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- From: Gig 601XL Builder
- Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- From: Frank Stutzman
- Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- From: es330td
- Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- Prev by Date: Re: How did KPHX Class B get so screwed up?
- Next by Date: Re: Serious STOL fun
- Previous by thread: Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- Next by thread: Re: Question for floatplane pilots or those familiar with the rules
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|