Re: Space Shuttle.
- From: jimp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:25:02 GMT
Ron Lee <ronleenospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The same amount of fuel that was needed to accelerate it in the first
place, plus lots more to get that extra fuel up.
Actually not the same amount...not even close. You only have to lower
the perigee such that you reenter on the proper trajectory whereas
going up you have to get into a circular orbit
How do you get rid of all the velocity than builds up as you decend
through near vacuum and your energy of postition becomes energy of
motion?
--
Jim Pennino
Remove .spam.sux to reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Space Shuttle.
- From: Ron Lee
- Re: Space Shuttle.
- References:
- Space Shuttle.
- From: Oz Lander
- Re: Space Shuttle.
- From: Bob Noel
- Re: Space Shuttle.
- From: Oz Lander
- Re: Space Shuttle.
- From: Ron Lee
- Space Shuttle.
- Prev by Date: Re: Awesome moonscape
- Next by Date: Re: 737 Blown Across Ramp
- Previous by thread: Re: Space Shuttle.
- Next by thread: Re: Space Shuttle.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|