Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Larry Dighera <LDighera@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:42:33 GMT
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:13:49 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder"
<wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net> wrote in
<13ic1j0eqeo1ef3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Well it's just that you are usually so good at cutting and pasting.
Thank you.
I don't know what that has to do with an original Subject line, but...
I include a lot of the research material I find in my articles for
several reasons:
1. Web-page content tends to become unavailable as it ages.
2. It makes it easier for the reader to view background material.
3. It is independently created, and thus not viewed as my
opinion.
4. It lends credibility to the validity of the subject.
5. It remains in the deja.com Usenet archive for decades
facilitating further research.
For those reasons, I wish others would adopt the practice of quoting
credible source material in their articles, including URLs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Gig 601XL Builder
- Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- References:
- Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Larry Dighera
- Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Gig 601XL Builder
- Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Larry Dighera
- Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- From: Gig 601XL Builder
- Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- Prev by Date: Re: Saint Alphonsus Liguori on 6-20-00
- Next by Date: Re: Long x-country...
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Bowing Competent For NextGen ATC?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|