Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip <nuny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 18:39:03 +0000 (UTC)
Flydive <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:460ea9f8_4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
Flydive <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:460e4afa_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Bertie the Bunyip wrote:you
Why not?
It autotunes the frequency and selects the inbound course of thebriefing.
approach you have selected, it does about 20 miles out.
You can override it anytime, you check it during your approach
It does not follow it unless you arm the approach on the panel.
I don't see any problem with it, as with anything on the aircraft
likehave the ultimate control, I let the autopilot fly the aircraftof
most
the time, but I always monitor what it does.Well, you have to.. obviously. They do strange things from time to
time..
Didn't mean to suggest you didn't. But the way you said it sounded
usingyou would let it nav onto the ils and fly it off it's own bat not
fromthe ILS at all, just it's own input like an LNAV non precision.
We don't even allow LNAV intercepts of ILS's. We always intercept
fromheading select, though we do allow a glidepath intercept from vnav
letbelow. I wouldn't trust the fjukkwit to do that, though. I wouldn't
thehim use a toaster, in fact.Well I agree not to trust it blindly, computers are computers.
Bertie
True that most of the time you intercept using heading mode, most of
time you are on radar vectors.manual
But when you are not on vectors and you are using the nav fuction to
follow the STAR, you can leave the panel on NAV, the FMS will
autotune the ILS frequency, set the imbound track, as the LOC comes
alive the flght director will switch to "green data" intercept the
LOC and the Glide path using the navaid. All that can be done on
autopilot. As I said, all the time the pilot will monitor it, and of
course
intervention is still needed to configure the aircraft andto
ultimately
land it.
No, I can't do that. For one thig, it's company policy we don't do it
in any of our airplanes, and for another, the possibility of a
parralell intercept due to even a minute amount of map shift is too
great, so I just wouldn't..
Bertie
Well, company policy is one thing, what the technology can do is
another. The map shift has nothing to do with it, the FD will
intercept the localizer signal and follow is just as it would if you
would tune it manually and intercept it on heading select.
no it won't, not if it intercepts the FMC track first and thats not in
the same place as the runway.
As you intercept the LOC you will not be using the FMS commands
anymore but the navaid signal.
IF you intercept it. That's the point and that's why we don't allow it.
We also consider it to be good practice re: pilot machine interface.
You're more in theh loop. Hdg sel only comes on when you're within a few
miles of interception if you're not already on it.
Bertie
.
- References:
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Flydive
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- From: Bertie the Bunyip
- Re: Old, but interesting topic
- Prev by Date: Re: I'm not a real Pilot?
- Next by Date: Re: Old, but interesting topic
- Previous by thread: Re: Old, but interesting topic
- Next by thread: Re: Old, but interesting topic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|